Which two strategies would be most effective for fifth-grade teachers trained in Sheltered English instruction?

The approach that emphasizes grouping ELL students with native speakers while also forcing ELL students' oral production may inadvertently create pressure and stress for the English Language Learners (ELL). This method lacks nuance in addressing the varied needs of students, particularly in a sheltered English instruction framework, which is designed to support language acquisition in a more nurturing environment.

In contrast, the most effective strategies would involve a supportive learning atmosphere where ELL students can engage meaningfully with their peers. Encouraging peer reviews, as suggested in one answer choice, allows ELL students to practice their language skills in a low-stress setting while receiving constructive feedback. This not only aids in language development but also fosters critical thinking skills. Reducing language complexity ensures that the material remains accessible, allowing ELL students to comprehend and participate without becoming overwhelmed by linguistic barriers.

In the context of effective sheltered English instruction, strategies should prioritize communication that values language acquisition in conjunction with academic content, creating a balanced, supportive environment for ELL students.